Description: Similarity plots based on correlation and median absolute deviation (MAD); adjusting colors for heatmaps; aggregate technical replicates; calculate pairwise fold-changes and log fold-changes; compute one- and two-way ANOVA; simplified interface to package 'limma' (Ritchie et al. (2015), <doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007> ) for moderated t-test and one-way ANOVA; Hamming and Levenshtein (edit) distance of strings as well as optimal alignment scores for global (Needleman-Wunsch) and local (Smith-Waterman) alignments with constant gap penalties (Merkl and Waack (2009), ISBN:978-3-527-32594-8).

Imports: stats, matrixTests, ggplot2, MKdescr, MKinfer(>= 0.4),
Description: Power analysis and sample size calculation for Welch and Hsu (Hedderich and Sachs (2018), ISBN:978-3-662-56657-2) t-tests including Monte-Carlo simulations of empirical power and type-I-error. Power and sample size calculation for Wilcoxon rank sum and signed rank tests via Monte-Carlo simulations. Power and sample size required for the evaluation of a diagnostic test(-system) (Flahault et al. (2005), <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009>; Dobbin and Simon (2007), <doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxj036>) as well as for a single proportion (Fleiss et al. (2003), ISBN:978-0-471-52629-2) and comparing two negative binomial rates (Zhu and Lakkis (2014), <doi:10.1002/sim.5947>).

Description: Power analysis and sample size calculation for Welch and Hsu (Hedderich and Sachs (2018), ISBN:978-3-662-56657-2) t-tests including Monte-Carlo simulations of empirical power and type-I-error. Power and sample size calculation for Wilcoxon rank sum and signed rank tests via Monte-Carlo simulations. Power and sample size required for the evaluation of a diagnostic test(-system) (Flahault et al. (2005), <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009>; Dobbin and Simon (2007), <doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxj036>) as well as for a single proportion (Fleiss et al. (2003), ISBN:978-0-471-52629-2; Piegorsch (2004), <doi:10.1016/j.csda.2003.10.002>; Thulin (2014), <doi:10.1214/14-ejs909>) and comparing two negative binomial rates (Zhu and Lakkis (2014), <doi:10.1002/sim.5947>).